Nystatin + Neomycin Sulfate + Thiostrepton + Triamcinolone Acetonide

Verify with FDA CVM →

54 adverse event reports submitted to the FDA

Important: Adverse event reports do not establish that a drug caused or contributed to the event. Consult your veterinarian before making treatment decisions.
54
Total Reports
4
Deaths Reported
740.0%
Death Rate

Active Ingredients

Nystatin + Neomycin Sulfate + Thiostrepton + Triamcinolone Acetonide

Administration Routes

UnknownTopicalAuricular (Otic)CutaneousOral

Species Affected

Dog 48
Cat 6

Most Affected Breeds

Retriever - Golden 10
Retriever - Labrador 8
Domestic Shorthair 4
Beagle 2
Shepherd Dog - German 2
Boxer (German Boxer) 2
Spaniel - King Charles Cavalier 2
Greyhound 2
Dog (other) 1
Crossbred Canine/dog 1

Most Reported Reactions

Vomiting 9
Emesis 6
Lethargy (see also Central nervous system depression in 'Neurological') 6
Lack of efficacy - NOS 5
Ear infection NOS 5
Not eating 3
Behavioural disorder NOS 3
Bacterial skin infection NOS 3
Polyuria 3
Decreased appetite 3
Death by euthanasia 3
Lethargy (see also Central nervous system depression in Neurological) 3

Outcome Breakdown

Outcome Unknown
17 (31.5%)
Recovered/Normal
16 (29.6%)
Ongoing
16 (29.6%)
Euthanized
3 (5.6%)
Recovered with Sequela
1 (1.9%)
Died
1 (1.9%)

Data Summary

Metric Value
Total adverse event reports 54
Reports involving death 4
Case-fatality rate (reported events) 740.0%
Distinct species in reports 2
Distinct breeds in reports 20
Distinct reactions reported 20
Active ingredients on file 1

Source: FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine — Adverse Event Reporting (CVM AER). Counts reflect voluntary reports only.

Nystatin + Neomycin Sulfate + Thiostrepton + Triamcinolone Acetonide Adverse Event Insights

The FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine database currently holds 54 adverse event reports referencing Nystatin + Neomycin Sulfate + Thiostrepton + Triamcinolone Acetonide, including 4 reports in which the animal died — a 740.0% case-fatality figure among reported events only, not a population-level mortality rate. Active ingredient on file: Nystatin + Neomycin Sulfate + Thiostrepton + Triamcinolone Acetonide. Reported administration routes include Unknown, Topical, Auricular (Otic), Cutaneous. These numbers reflect voluntary submissions from pet owners, veterinarians, and manufacturers and therefore under-represent mild events and over-represent severe ones — a pattern the FDA has documented repeatedly for pharmacovigilance datasets.

The species most frequently named in Nystatin + Neomycin Sulfate + Thiostrepton + Triamcinolone Acetonide reports are Dog (48 reports), Cat (6 reports), with Dog accounting for the largest share. Within those species, Retriever - Golden (10), Retriever - Labrador (8), Domestic Shorthair (4) appear most often — though breed popularity and ownership density shape these counts as much as any drug-specific sensitivity. This distribution matters because the same active ingredient can behave very differently across body sizes, ages, and species physiology.

The most commonly reported clinical signs associated with Nystatin + Neomycin Sulfate + Thiostrepton + Triamcinolone Acetonide are Vomiting (9), Emesis (6), Lethargy (see also Central nervous system depression in 'Neurological') (6), Lack of efficacy - NOS (5). Of the 54 reports with a coded outcome, Outcome Unknown is the leading category at 31.5%. Because FDA adverse event data describes correlation rather than causation, these figures are best used to frame informed questions with a veterinarian and to compare reporting patterns across related products — not as a standalone safety verdict on Nystatin + Neomycin Sulfate + Thiostrepton + Triamcinolone Acetonide.

Source: FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine — Adverse Event Reports FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine — Adverse Event Reports Data reflects voluntary submissions and may not represent actual incidence rates

Related

Data sourced from official AKC, AVMA, ACVO, and breed-club veterinary references. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainBreed Editorial